"Boosting rural residents' pensions now can improve their expectations for future income, encouraging higher current spending and further supporting economic growth."
I support redistribution policies, in part because the benefits of reform tend to be unequally distributed with some households even becoming worse off as a result. So redistribution is essential if we want to implement reforms to make the economy more productive.
Thanks for your responses but they seem devoid of any reasoned arguments or evidence. Perhaps one day when you are less ideological we can have a reasoned discussion. Cheers.
I support redistribution policies, in part because the benefits of reform tend to be unequally distributed with some households even becoming worse off as a result. So redistribution is essential if we want to implement reforms to make the economy more productive.
What ideology? The great Bengal Famine and the great Irish Famines were the result of British indifference to the lack of resource entitlements on the part of the starving. You need to be less ideological and focus more on outcomes.
I support redistribution policies, in part because the benefits of reform tend to be unequally distributed with some households even becoming worse off as a result. So redistribution is essential if we want to implement reforms to make the economy more productive.
“fair income distribution” is an extremely dangerous power to give politicians
Remember the 30 million who starved to death in China.
Thanks for your responses but they seem devoid of any reasoned arguments or evidence. Perhaps one day when you are less ideological we can have a reasoned discussion. Cheers.
You are a thief
You take what isn’t yours and leave your victims to die of starvation
“Leading economists”…. bullshit. That is a simpleton’s lie.
I support redistribution policies, in part because the benefits of reform tend to be unequally distributed with some households even becoming worse off as a result. So redistribution is essential if we want to implement reforms to make the economy more productive.
30 million starved to death
Starvation is a cruel way to die
Those who starved to death died i fields and along road sides. Others, near starvation, were too weak to move the bodies
Your ideology is cruel
What ideology? The great Bengal Famine and the great Irish Famines were the result of British indifference to the lack of resource entitlements on the part of the starving. You need to be less ideological and focus more on outcomes.
This is Huang Cun. Your ideology starved their grandfather to death on a piece of land his son had bought for him.
Your ideology is one of torture (starvation is torture…watching your child starve is torture) and your ideology is one of murder.
The picture is Huang Cun. Their grandfather, or great grandfather, starved to death only yards from where this picture was taken
Huang’s eldest son got a job in Shanghai and he gave that money to his father. His father bought rich farm land, enough to feed himself and his famiy.
Evil people like you, thieves, decided Old Huang had too much land. They took his land and put him in a commune where he starved to death
The only EQUALITY you offer is the equality of starving to death.
Political dictators cause mass starvation
Every time…